Everyone expects the Judicial branch of our government to be the bulwark against unlimited Executive power.
I want to know what flavor of Kool-Aid they are drinking.
The Judiciary has no innate power. It's power is derived from the acquiescence of the people
So what happens if a duly elected POTUS decides to give the Judiciary the middle finger?
Nothing.....unless the people rise up and take their power back.
The power of the Judiciary, and the rule of law, comes only from principled people who are willing to accept the decision of the court.
Even the SCOTUS is not "supreme". It's nothing... if people don't agree to obey it's mandate.
So if a POTUS or any other government entity refuses to acquiesce to the rule of law, the only way to restore democracy, or the rule of law, is by revolution.
We saw it in the 1800s. We saw it, again, as recently as the 1960s. Is that where we are headed once again? Sadly, I think so and have since 2015.
I am a concerned citizen. #newsjunkie
Hi my friend!
ReplyDeleteI do understand and I share your concern.
But more than half of US citizen have wanted Trump and are probably happy with his behaviour
I think he also feels stronger and stronger since he does not meet any significant opposition from the rest of the word. Should he succeed in some of his crazy plans, he will feel even stronger and his fans may become even more hysterical !
Is there a chance for a révolution ?
Jm