Items that pique my interest: videos, topical stories, movie, book reviews, political essays, commentary, political art, humor and photos.
Saturday, April 11, 2020
PANDEMIC
"The Los Angeles Times reported that two months before the virus spread through Wuhan, the Trump administration halted a $200 million early-warning program to train scientists in China and elsewhere to deal with a pandemic. The name of the program? “PREDICT.”"
Saturday, April 04, 2020
Tuesday, March 24, 2020
Monday, February 17, 2020
AHOY! A BLOOMBERG IS ON THE HORIZON
Let's suppose Bloomberg ends up being the nominee. He will definitely need, and should definitely have, a lady running mate (especially in view of the mysterious dirty joke pamphlet).
Forget the alt-right haters; his current weaknesses seem to lie with minority & mid-west voters. Although his minority (black) support is on the upswing -- because he is seen as the dRump killer -- I haven't seen any discussion about Bloomberg's chances in the mid-west.
Enter Amy Klobuchar. She's a she, she's moderate, smart as a whip, tough, no nonsense & slightly more charming than Bloomberg.
OTOH, Kamala Harris is all those things plus she appears to be even more approachable, has real charm, an infectious laugh, is a minority & all that counts for something anywhere, any time.
Having said that, a Bloomberg/Harris ticket would represent the two coasts, once again leaving the mid-west as flyover country & I'm not sure the Dem's should try that again (even though Uncle Joe will undoubtedly be waiting in the wings to help out). So maybe it will be Bloomberg/Klobuchar.
However, given that the overriding imperative in 2020 is to make dRump the unPOTUS, I believe all the losing Democratic candidates -- maybe not Bernie because he'll be pouting up in VT -- but a wonderful culturally diverse cross section of very smart surrogates like Castro (Latinos), Beto (idealists), Booker (love preacher), Bennett (Big Sky reformer), Mayor Pete (LBGTQ + Iowa) & Warren (the pragmatic revolutionary) will be out campaigning for the chosen one, addressing some of the electorate nooks & crannies across the nation.
If I'm right, the current POTUS can kiss his ass goodbye. Unfortunately, that will not rid us of the Trump/Kushner cabal. They will be feeding in the political trough, dogging the Democratic administration for years to come. But it will eventually recede like a bad dream.
Forget the alt-right haters; his current weaknesses seem to lie with minority & mid-west voters. Although his minority (black) support is on the upswing -- because he is seen as the dRump killer -- I haven't seen any discussion about Bloomberg's chances in the mid-west.
Enter Amy Klobuchar. She's a she, she's moderate, smart as a whip, tough, no nonsense & slightly more charming than Bloomberg.
OTOH, Kamala Harris is all those things plus she appears to be even more approachable, has real charm, an infectious laugh, is a minority & all that counts for something anywhere, any time.
Having said that, a Bloomberg/Harris ticket would represent the two coasts, once again leaving the mid-west as flyover country & I'm not sure the Dem's should try that again (even though Uncle Joe will undoubtedly be waiting in the wings to help out). So maybe it will be Bloomberg/Klobuchar.
However, given that the overriding imperative in 2020 is to make dRump the unPOTUS, I believe all the losing Democratic candidates -- maybe not Bernie because he'll be pouting up in VT -- but a wonderful culturally diverse cross section of very smart surrogates like Castro (Latinos), Beto (idealists), Booker (love preacher), Bennett (Big Sky reformer), Mayor Pete (LBGTQ + Iowa) & Warren (the pragmatic revolutionary) will be out campaigning for the chosen one, addressing some of the electorate nooks & crannies across the nation.
If I'm right, the current POTUS can kiss his ass goodbye. Unfortunately, that will not rid us of the Trump/Kushner cabal. They will be feeding in the political trough, dogging the Democratic administration for years to come. But it will eventually recede like a bad dream.
Saturday, February 15, 2020
FOLLOWING THE SHINY OBJECT, JOURNALISM IN THE AGE OF TRUMP
What I wouldn't do to sit down with Walter Cronkite, Bud Benjamin, Peter Jennings, Tom Brokaw, Fred Friendly, Roger Mudd, Chet Huntley, David Brinkley, Tim Russert, Mike Wallace, Bob Schieffer, and a few others to discuss how the TV news outlets are covering this political season.
I think it borders on irresponsibility especially as TV journos consider themselves an indispensable column in the democratic coliseum. But it may be time to realize that what was once fine TV news reporting is now slithering from the Fourth Estate into the Fifth Estate.
Journalists and news outlets of all kinds ARE indispensable to a healthy democracy. However, there is much public sentiment that views TV news as utterly dispensable. Considering how much news is consumed over the airwaves, this is dangerous but may be deserved.
Journalists and news outlets of all kinds ARE indispensable to a healthy democracy. However, there is much public sentiment that views TV news as utterly dispensable. Considering how much news is consumed over the airwaves, this is dangerous but may be deserved.
Day after day, there is uneven, lazy TV reporting on our presidential candidates, arguably the most important story in the world for all that it suggests about our place amongst nations. I watch the coverage day after day. I find myself talking to my TV set. I'm both disgusted and sad.
It's like watching an extremely accomplished, greatly respected individual, who once had gravitas, now living as a drug addict, on the street, family-less, home-less, fund-less, scrounging around, wondering how to get their next (ratings) fix.
* * *
First published in my local newspaper during the 2016-17 campaign season. Three years later I am able to say that journalism (especially newspapers) are again carrying their weight, restoring their mantle & leading the way.
February 15, 2020
February 15, 2020
Thursday, February 13, 2020
ACCESSORIES TO MURDER
Steyer, Bloomberg, Soros, Schultz & other such fortunates should spend
their billions to target EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN SENATOR in Washington up for
re-election in 2020.
From now until November, the billionaires should blanket newspapers,
magazines, airwaves, Facebook, Instagram & Twitter with facts exposing these
unprincipled representatives to the cleansing effects of sunlight, for turning
their backs on our civilized society. They are criminals.
The law goes like this: If you are a witness to murder and you do nothing,
you are an accessory to the crime.
The crime: murdering the rule of law, murdering the Constitution, murdering
our values, our respect for each other, murdering our way of life, all to
preserve their miserable fiefdoms & by so doing, unleashing the sociopath,
who resides in the White House, onto the rest of us.
Making dRump the unPOTUS is the imperative but let's finish it in one
sanitary flush.
Voters in every town, city & state that has a Republican Senator up for
a re-election, should organize to wipe out these spineless individuals. Citizens
should take to the streets again, again & again in order to show them the
door in November.
These Senators are nothing less than a virulent form of political Ebola
that spreads like wildfire. And that's already happened via social media &
on the airwaves; both in broadcast & cable.
It is now up to us to mobilize our forces to quarantine it for reasons of
our national health.
So organize! If we can get to the moon in less than a decade, we can run
these criminals out of office in less than ten months.
Wake up! The clock is ticking, ticking, ticking...
Monday, February 10, 2020
Sunday, February 09, 2020
Friday, January 31, 2020
JAY SEKULOW : EVEN MORE DANGER! DANGER! DANGER!
Associated Press reviewed 10 years of tax returns for the ACLJ and other charities tied to Sekulow, which are released to the public under federal law.
The records from 2008 to 2017, the most recent year available, show that more than $65 million in charitable funds were paid to Sekulow, his wife, his sons, his brother, his sister-in-law, his nephew and corporations they own.
Daniel Borochoff, president of the American Institute of Philanthropy, said Sekulow appears to be mixing his defense of Trump with his charitable endeavors. The group has issued a “Donor Alert” about ACLJ on its CharityWatch website.
Daniel Borochoff, president of the American Institute of Philanthropy, said Sekulow appears to be mixing his defense of Trump with his charitable endeavors. The group has issued a “Donor Alert” about ACLJ on its CharityWatch website.
Thursday, January 30, 2020
DANGER! DANGER! DANGER!
[...] an NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll found that about 41% of Americans surveyed do not think the country is prepared to protect the U.S. election system from another attack.
Voters also say their biggest concern is disinformation, followed by voter fraud and voter suppression. Forty-four percent think it's likely that many votes will not actually be counted in 2020.
American Distrust Of The Voting Process Is Widespread, NPR Poll Finds Jan. 21, 2020
While most voters have confidence in their state and local governments to run a fair election, 43% do not think those officials have done enough to make sure that there's no foreign interference.
Many more blame President Trump. Fifty-six percent say he has done little or nothing to keep the elections safe. A slim majority think the president, who has repeatedly questioned Russian tampering in 2016, actually encourages foreign interference.
This lack of voter confidence has unnerved lower-level election officials as the nation heads into what's expected to be a highly contentious presidential race with high levels of turnout.
"My biggest concern in 2020 is that regardless of outcome, we will be faced with somewhere around the end of the first week in November, this concern by half of the country that they lost the election illegitimately, " says Colorado Election Director Judd Choate.
Voters also say their biggest concern is disinformation, followed by voter fraud and voter suppression. Forty-four percent think it's likely that many votes will not actually be counted in 2020.
American Distrust Of The Voting Process Is Widespread, NPR Poll Finds Jan. 21, 2020
While most voters have confidence in their state and local governments to run a fair election, 43% do not think those officials have done enough to make sure that there's no foreign interference.
Many more blame President Trump. Fifty-six percent say he has done little or nothing to keep the elections safe. A slim majority think the president, who has repeatedly questioned Russian tampering in 2016, actually encourages foreign interference.
This lack of voter confidence has unnerved lower-level election officials as the nation heads into what's expected to be a highly contentious presidential race with high levels of turnout.
"My biggest concern in 2020 is that regardless of outcome, we will be faced with somewhere around the end of the first week in November, this concern by half of the country that they lost the election illegitimately, " says Colorado Election Director Judd Choate.
SOLIPSISM
"His presidency would be powered by solipsism. From the moment Trump swore an oath to defend the Constitution and commit to serve the nation, he governed largely to protect and promote himself."
Excerpted from "A Very Stable Genius"
Excerpted from "A Very Stable Genius"
Tuesday, January 28, 2020
THE ART OF THE DEAL
Excerpts from an NPR interview with Fred Kaplan, author of "The Bomb: Presidents, Generals, and the Secret History of Nuclear War"
Please note the frequent ellipses. This is NOT a transcript. I have edited for brevity but have not changed the direction of the interview.
Read these excerpts with 2020 vision.
"In 1962, Kennedy faces a real crisis - The Soviets [were] building nuclear missiles in Cuba [...] So Kennedy and advisers had to figure out what to do and whether the wrong move would trigger a nuclear war.
[...] Even now the real story is not that well-known. [...] On the third day of the [...] 13-day crisis, Kennedy is kind of mulling. He's saying, Khrushchev seems to have got himself in a trap. Maybe we need to give him a face-saving gesture. Maybe we should trade the missiles that we have in Turkey for his missiles in Cuba. Nobody pays any attention to this.
On the Saturday, on the last day of the crisis, Khrushchev issues a telegram proposing a deal - we'll get rid of our missiles in Cuba; you get rid of your missiles in Turkey. And Kennedy says, well, this seems like a fair trade. And everybody around the table is against this - not just the generals but all the civilians. Bobby Kennedy, Robert McNamara, McGeorge Bundy - all these reasonable people, they're all against it. [...]
Kennedy lets them talk. And he says, well, you know, [...] it seems to me that once [...] we start doing 500 sorties a day against the missile sites and then invade the island, [...] then the Russians would grab Berlin. [...] Well, the argument goes on. Kennedy secretly sends Bobby to make the deal with the Soviet ambassador.
[...] Not known at the time - that the Russians had already installed nuclear warheads on some of those missiles. It also turned out that the Russians had secretly deployed 40,000 troops to the island of Cuba to stave off a potential American invasion.
So if Kennedy had succumbed to all of his advisers and said, yeah, you're right, we can't take this deal, and gone ahead with the airstrikes, gone ahead with the invasion, the Russians might very well have launched one of those missiles [...] and the small invasion force going into Cuba would have found themselves being repelled by 40,000 Soviet troops. In other words, we would have been in a war with the Soviet Union.
So, you know, one lesson of this is that who you elect as president really does matter sometimes. [...] The fact that you have a lot of smart advisers doesn't necessarily seal the deal."
Sunday, January 19, 2020
IS MICHAEL BLOOMBERG THE ONE?
It is my opinion that to win the presidency in 2020, Democrats will need a strong MODERATE candidate to run against Donald Trump.
While Joe Biden is the only viable moderate candidate currently on the campaign trail, he has not generated much excitement in the electorate although he does seem to have support in the working classes & black communities. However until now, there has not been a viable REALPOLITIK alternative. I believe that situation changed when Michael Bloomberg entered the 2020 campaign for President of the United States.
Michael Bloomberg is socially liberal & fiscally practical, which is different than being fiscally conservative. As a graduate of Johns Hopkins University & Harvard Business School he, himself, is well educated & believes in a strong public education system for everyone. To that end, he took controversial measures to improve public education for millions of children in New York City during his time as Mayor.
As an extremely competitive, tough skinned New Yorker he will stand up to Donald Trump -- another New Yorker -- on the campaign trail & on the debate stage.
He recognizes and has called Donald Trump a con man & will prove it. Bloomberg can play dirty as necessary but it will be based on facts, not tweets, memes & name calling. He will bring the latest M1 Abrams to the gunfight and will obliterate Donald Trump intellectually at any level, on any issue.
Unlike Donald Trump, Michael Bloomberg is a multi-billionaire who earned his money, does not need and will not take a penny from anyone in any form. He cannot & will not be bought by any lobby & has demonstrated that by improving the lives of millions of New Yorkers as mayor over a period of 12 years. Since then, he has spent millions fighting special interests that have warped social issues affecting our everyday lives.
For 20 years, he was the CEO of a successful & respected business built on facts. It is clear he is a data driven executive who leads on reality, not emotion or politics. In other words, he is not an ideologue. That’s Realpolitik.
As a businessman he believes in tax realignment and has created thousands of jobs beyond the 20,000 employed by his own company while mayor of New York.
He is action oriented, but has proven to be a collaborative, successful leader who does not shy away from argument, is a measured & practical problem solver, is not afraid to apologize & admit error, has taken successful action on the environment, gun violence, student debt & health care. Moreover, he is neither a sociopath nor a psychopath. In other words, he is not nuts.
Bloomberg has said that he would turn the Situation Room into an open space, everyday collaborative work area where he will roll up his sleeves to serve alongside his advisers, appointees &/or cabinet members, to listen to facts & to discuss current issues; all before making decisions. His only use of the Oval Office will be for ceremonial occasions. In my opinion, all this signals a constructive work ethic & a governing style that we desperately need.
You may not agree with my assessments but, in my opinion, Michael Bloomberg is a substantive contender & should be considered for the 46th Presidency of the United States of America beginning January 20th, 2021.
Thursday, January 09, 2020
WAG THE DOG
I have no doubt that Donald J Trump picked Suleimani from a list of possible targets for a very simple reason.
It's called getting the biggest bang for your buck.
It is counter programming. And as long as he can keep it going, one way or another, he will succeed in blunting the national conversation about impeachment while honing a jingoistic campaign for another four years.
Only a broad swath of activist groups -- along with fulsome news coverage -- may be able to change the conversation.
Unfortunately, that will most likely include a lot of national unrest. It would be 1968 again.
Tuesday, November 12, 2019
ALL HAIL THE UMBRELLA GUN
In 1978, Georgi
Markov was on his way to work at the BBC in London when he felt a sharp
sting on his thigh. Behind him, he saw a man picking up an umbrella. The man,
who spoke with a foreign accent, apologized and hurried into a cab that whisked
him away.
That night Markov came down with a fever; four days
later he was dead from ricin poisoning. A medical examiner found a tiny pellet,
less than 2 millimeters in diameter, in his leg. Markov, a dissident novelist
who had defected from Bulgaria, had been assassinated. Based on the details he
remembered before he died, investigators developed
a theory of how he had been shot.
That umbrella, they thought, was not a normal
umbrella, but one that had been transformed into a gun.
Umbrella guns are by no means the only type of
disguised weapon. “Man has attempted to disguise firearms into just about
everything you can possibly imagine,” says David H. Fink, a collector in Georgia
who has
written about disguised guns for the American Society of Arms Collectors.
Guns have been hidden in pillboxes, a scribe’s casing, a flute, a pencil, a
Pepsi can. There have
been pocket-watch guns, ring guns, bike-pump guns, and lipstick guns.
But perhaps no other type of disguised gun has
caught the imagination of spies, writers, and conspiracy theorists as the
umbrella gun. As a weapon, it is both a little bit ridiculous and deviously
clever, and since its use in Markov’s assassination, it had taken its place in
the villainous weapon hall of fame.
The umbrella gun was invented in the 19th century,
as a variant of the more popular cane gun. First
patented in 1823, cane guns were relatively simple weapons, disguised to
look like walking canes—a gentleman’s weapon. The umbrella gun took the same
idea and applied it to another personal item.
The earliest extant example of an umbrella gun may
be one in Fink’s collection, dated to 1860. The umbrella was made in London and
marked “Armstrong reg. British Make.” The handle has its own marking: “Richard
Grinell 1860.” (Grinnell was probably the owner.) The shaft of the umbrella is
actually a rifle.
Fink also has a different type of umbrella gun in
his collection, from 1892. In this design, the umbrella shaft itself isn’t a
gun. Instead, it contains a small revolver that slides in. To fire it, you pull
the gun out of the umbrella’s top.
“These two are the only two honest umbrella guns
I’ve seen, and I’ve been collecting for over 50 years,” Fink says. “The survival
rate of these things is not very good. The guns may survive, but the umbrellas
fall apart.”
In the first part of the 20th century, umbrella
guns got little play: in 1917 Popular Science described
a “toy gun for the pacifists,” that would shoot an umbrella instead of a bullet,
and in 1928 Popular Mechanics described
how to turn an old umbrella into a spring gun. The most famous user of the
umbrella gun, up until the 1970s, was the Penguin, the
portly, besuited supervillain of the Batman comics.
In his first appearance, in 1941, the Penguin
carried an umbrella with a hollow shaft, which he used to steal art, and Batman
soon discovers that his enemy has a giant collection of inventive umbrellas,
including one that fires poison gas. Over the many reinventions of the Batman
universe, the Penguin has hidden all manner of weapons in his umbrellas,
including a flame-thrower and a machine gun.
In the 1960s, though, American intelligence agencies
were developing real-life versions of the Penguin’s sneaky weapons. The CIA reportedly
created a stun-gun umbrella that would shoot poison darts from its tip, similar
to the umbrella used to assassinate Markov.
That umbrella, sometimes called the “Bulgarian
umbrella,” may not have technically been a gun: it didn’t work by setting off
gunpowder. The tiny pellet that killed Markov might have been stabbed into his
leg using compressed air, a hypodermic needle, or another injecting device. The
gun itself was likely
designed by the KGB for Bulgaria’s secret service.
After the “umbrella murder” became famous, the
umbrella gun enjoyed a bit of a renaissance in the popular imagination. One theory about President John
F. Kennedy’s assassination centered on an umbrella gun. In 1985, a company
called J. Wilson built a very classy model. On television and in film, the
umbrella gun became a more common murder weapon and spy tool; most recently,
Colin Firth was equipped with a multifunctional umbrella gun in the 2015 movie
Kingsman: The Secret Service—a homage to the umbrella wielded by
superspy John Steed in The Avengers, which had a sword hidden inside
and, at least once, poison gas.*
Outside of fiction, though, umbrella guns are still
relatively rare, although in 2014 a man in Seattle was charged with using a
rifle “stuffed into the sleeve of a Nike golf umbrella,” reports
SeattlePI. At this point in the history of the umbrella
gun, it’s more of a cliché than a clever trick: if anyone suspicious points the
tip of an umbrella at you, you know to watch out.
Source: atlasobscura.com,
Written by Sarah Laskow
Wednesday, October 30, 2019
Friday, April 19, 2019
Wednesday, April 10, 2019
Thursday, February 21, 2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







